Are there parts of the theory which you find confusing?
Kerr (2006) says that "networks are important but haven't changed learning so much that we need to throw away all of the established learning theories and replace them with a brand new one" (A challenge to connectivism). Kerr lists three criteria for a good learning theory, including the requirement that it should result in learning reform. Connectivism does not lead to learning reform, however, because its language is too generalized. In addition, Kerr finds the connectivism theory lacks credibility, as a result of misrepresentations of existing theories, such as constructivism, behaviorism and cognitivism (A challenge to connectivism).
I agree with this notion that challenges Connectivism. I am not 100% sure that Siemen is actually providing a learning theory. It is more of his personal view of learning in today’s society. His view tends to represent how students develop their learning skills. I also agree that this theory is too generalized and lacks credibility. His theory is suggesting that students learn in different ways and that teachers should teach differently to adapt to today’s learner. I do agree that if how students learn is changing, our role as educators needs to change so the learner benefits.
Kerr (2006) says that "networks are important but haven't changed learning so much that we need to throw away all of the established learning theories and replace them with a brand new one" (A challenge to connectivism). Kerr lists three criteria for a good learning theory, including the requirement that it should result in learning reform. Connectivism does not lead to learning reform, however, because its language is too generalized. In addition, Kerr finds the connectivism theory lacks credibility, as a result of misrepresentations of existing theories, such as constructivism, behaviorism and cognitivism (A challenge to connectivism).
Isn't a theory a personal view that can't be either proved or disproved? I agree that his theory isn't new. It makes me think of something we have known for awhile: "Students learn differently based on their own experiences." It is good for differentiation and letting students make connections with other students.
ReplyDeleteBrad
I agree our role as educators needs to change as well, however technology or not, we need to change to focus on the needs of our students. Being inflexible and unable to assess our students' needs, we do a disservice to them. By ignoring the huge role of technology and how it has enhanced learning, we only create a barrier which cannot be overcome. I agree with you on theory as well. It's a skill to be able to navigate your way through information.
ReplyDeleteBrooke